On the contrary

Comedy, cancellation and killing your ego

Featured in

  • Published 20241105
  • ISBN: 978-1-923213-01-2
  • Extent: 196 pp
  • Paperback, ebook, PDF

Australian novelist Lexi Freiman knows how to walk a literary tightrope. Her fiction is both savagely funny and strikingly empathetic, daring to satirise the hot-­button issues of identity politics and cancel culture without eliding the complex motivations that underpin them. In her 2018 debut Inappropriation, which was longlisted for the Miles Franklin Award, a trio of schoolgirls spectacularly misunderstand Donna Haraway’s Cyborg Manifesto; in 2023’s The Book of Ayn, which saw Freiman interviewed on The Daily Show in the US, a newly cancelled writer finds herself radicalised by the work of notorious iconoclast Ayn Rand. In both novels, Freiman dextrously uses satire and absurdity to illuminate the complications and contradictions of selfhood in contemporary culture.

In this conversation – a condensed and lightly edited version of a 2024 Brisbane Writers Festival session – Lexi talks to Griffith Review Editor Carody Culver about the allure of contrarianism, the necessary selfishness of creativity and the importance of a good joke.

Already a subscriber? Sign in here

If you are an educator or student wishing to access content for study purposes please contact us at griffithreview@griffith.edu.au

Share article

About the author

Lexi Freiman

Lexi Freiman is the author of the novels The Book of Ayn and Inappropriation, longlisted for the Center for Fiction First Novel Prize and the Miles Franklin...

More from this edition

Girls to the front

Non-fictionIf there are no women in leadership in a synagogue, many of us don’t bother to come. Or if we do come, we know there’s no real point joining a board or committee – our opinions count for less. And this means that Orthodox Judaism risks losing a new generation of Orthodox women – women like me, who would never accept equivalent lack of opportunity and education in our professional and personal lives.

Up for debate

In ConversationDebate emphasises different ideals. You are forced to argue for positions you don’t believe and, regardless of your stance, you learn always to consider the opposing perspective. That is quite literal: after preparing your case, you turn to a different sheet and write the four best arguments for the other side or mark up your argument for its flaws and inconsistencies. Paper and pen. That is countercultural at a time when we expect a tight nexus between speech and identity, and I think there is something to be gained from such role-­play.

Auburn Falls

Non-fiction Trigger warning: loss of a child, discussion of miscarriages This piece was written with the permission of my sister and mother, though neither wants to...

Stay up to date with the latest, news, articles and special offers from Griffith Review.